During a recent interview with NBC News, Kamala Harris expressed her frustration with America’s divisive politics, stating her desire to “close the page” on what she called an era of division.

Democratic presidential nominee and current U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during a rally at Erie Insurance Arena in Erie on Oct. 14, 2024.

Kamala’s comments come as both major political parties navigate the deeply polarized landscape, with key figures on both sides, including Kamala and her opponents, acknowledging the sharp differences that exist across the country.

Kamala’s remarks highlight the ongoing challenge of bridging the gap between voters with starkly different views on policies, leadership, and national priorities.

Now Available: Trump ‘Keep Fighting’ Bobblehead

Her comment about “closing the page” raised questions about what this means in practical terms, especially as the country faces significant policy differences on issues such as immigration, the economy, and social issues.

Kamala’s attempt to emphasize unity has been a recurring theme in her campaign, but some critics argue that Kamalaherself has been a divisive figure, particularly on matters like abortion.

Under which President were you better off financially?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from RVM News, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Kamala’s’ vision for the country has evolved since her 2020 presidential campaign, where she was a strong advocate for left-leaning policies that included government mandates and restrictions.

Her positions on certain issues, such as abortion, have remained consistent, with Kamala being a vocal supporter of abortion rights, including taxpayer-funded access to the procedure without restrictions.

In the NBC interview, Kamala was asked if she would support religious exemptions for practitioners or institutions like Catholic hospitals that object to performing abortions.

She declined to endorse any exemptions, reaffirming her staunch support for abortion access.

Kamala’s stance on abortion has been a focal point of her campaign and is an area where she has consistently rejected any limitations.

This unwavering position has drawn criticism from opponents who argue that her policies disregard religious freedom, a key tenet of the First Amendment.

Critics have pointed to her refusal to entertain restrictions or exemptions, suggesting that her views on abortion overshadow other concerns about personal freedom and religious rights.

In her previous campaign, Kamala supported measures such as court-packing and Electoral College reform, ideas that some see as an attempt to reshape long-standing institutions in favor of progressive policies.

Her openness to Supreme Court “reform” has been met with skepticism, especially given the court’s role in protecting constitutional rights, including religious liberty.

Kamala’s running mate has also expressed support for dismantling the Electoral College, further fueling concerns among critics about their commitment to preserving democratic institutions.

As Kamala campaigns for the presidency, these issues remain central to the broader debate about the direction of the country.

With the election approaching, voters will ultimately decide whether her vision aligns with their priorities, particularly on contentious matters like abortion and religious freedom.

Kamala’s effort to balance calls for unity with her progressive agenda continues to draw attention as both supporters and critics weigh in on her leadership and policy positions.