Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has allocated up to $126,000 in taxpayer funds to JBS, a major meat processing company, following an investigation that revealed the use of child labor at some of its facilities.

Oct 1, 2024; New York, NY, USA; Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz stops at Justino’s Pizza after the CBS News vice presidential debate between Republican JD Vance and Walz. The debate was moderated by CBS Evening News anchor and managing editor Norah O’Donnell and Face the Nation moderator and chief foreign affairs correspondent Margaret Brennan. Mandatory Credit: Jasper Colt-USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

This decision has raised significant concerns among critics regarding the appropriateness of funding a company implicated in such serious violations.

In February 2023, the U.S. Department of Labor conducted an investigation and found that at least 31 children were employed in hazardous conditions, specifically tasked with cleaning dangerous powered equipment during overnight shifts at JBS USA plants.

Now Available: Trump ‘Keep Fighting’ Bobblehead

Notably, the children were employed by a third-party cleaning service, not directly by JBS.

Despite this distinction, the findings have cast a shadow over the company’s labor practices.

In June, Minnesota’s Office of Higher Education announced a grant aimed at funding job training for 28 staff members at the JBS plant located in Worthington, Minnesota.

This plant was specifically highlighted in the investigation, as at least 22 children were found to have been illegally employed there for cleaning tasks.

Under which President were you better off financially?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from RVM News, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Governor Walz defended the funding, stating, “These career growth and training opportunities allow Minnesotans to get ahead in their careers while helping businesses recruit and retain talent.

It’s a win-win.” His comments were made in the context of promoting workforce development initiatives aimed at bolstering local employment.

However, this move has attracted criticism, particularly from Republican lawmakers and advocacy groups. Florida Republican Representative Anna Paulina Luna took to social media to express her disapproval, stating, “Walz just got busted for shoveling taxpayer dollars to a corporation that was USING MIGRANT CHILDREN to clean slaughterhouses. Literal slavery.”

The controversy surrounding JBS does not end with the child labor allegations.

The company has faced multiple scandals in recent years.

It was named in a lawsuit filed by McDonald’s, along with several other beef producers, alleging that they conspired to limit beef supply and inflate prices.

Additionally, JBS’s Brazil-based parent company, J&F Investments SA, pled guilty to foreign bribery charges in October 2020, agreeing to pay a fine exceeding $250 million.

Adding to the scrutiny, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against JBS in February, alleging that the company misled consumers regarding its environmental impact.

These legal challenges have further complicated the public image of JBS and raised questions about its business practices.

The decision by Governor Walz to fund JBS with taxpayer money comes at a time when the scrutiny of corporate practices is intensifying, particularly regarding labor standards and ethical business operations.

Critics argue that public funds should not support companies that have demonstrated a willingness to engage in practices that exploit vulnerable populations, such as children.

As the fallout from the investigation continues, the funding for JBS is likely to remain a contentious issue in Minnesota.

The situation highlights the complex relationship between state governments and major corporations, particularly in industries that are essential to the economy but have faced significant criticism for their labor practices.

With the 2024 elections approaching, how Governor Walz navigates this issue may play a crucial role in shaping public perception and voter sentiment in Minnesota.

As lawmakers from both sides of the aisle weigh in, the spotlight remains on the ethical implications of funding a company embroiled in such serious controversies.