U.S. and European officials have reportedly been discussing a range of options to deter further Russian territorial gains in Ukraine, including the possibility of providing Ukraine with nuclear weapons, according to The New York Times.

*U.S. OFFICIALS REPORTEDLY DISCUSSED GIVING NUCLEAR WEAPONS TO UKRAINE

🇺🇸🇺🇦🇷🇺 pic.twitter.com/qfpbnVVSFw

— Investing.com (@Investingcom) November 25, 2024

Celebrate Trump's Historic 2024 Victory with the Exclusive Trump 47th President Collection!

This discussion comes as both the U.S. and its NATO allies seek ways to bolster Ukraine’s position before the transition of power in Washington on January 20, when President-elect Donald Trump will be sworn into office.

The Biden-Harris administration, concerned about the growing threat from Russia, has been working to expedite the flow of weapons to Ukraine, including long-range weapons that would allow Kiev to strike targets within Russian territory.

Despite these efforts, officials from the U.S. intelligence community have cautioned that these actions will likely have limited impact on the outcome of the war in the short term.

According to briefed officials, “US spy agencies have assessed that speeding up the provisions of weapons, ammunition and matériel for Ukraine will do little to change the course of the war in the short term,” as reported by The New York Times.

With the election of Trump earlier this month, U.S. and European officials reportedly believe that Russia may be holding off on a major escalation of the conflict until the new administration takes office.

The Times cited U.S. officials who speculated that Russian President Vladimir Putin would wait until Trump’s presidency to take any major steps, due to the expectation that Trump will take a less aggressive stance towards Russia compared to the Biden administration.

Officials believe that the escalation risk of allowing Ukraine to strike Russian targets with U.S.-supplied weaponry has diminished with the incoming administration.

The article noted that “Biden administration officials believe, calculating that Putin of Russia knows he has to wait only two months for the new administration.”

In response to the ongoing war, U.S. and European officials are reportedly discussing potential deterrence strategies for Ukraine, including the possibility of stockpiling a conventional arsenal strong enough to strike a decisive blow if Russia were to violate a ceasefire.

Some officials even suggested that the U.S. could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine, which were removed from the country following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

If true this is treasonous

That would’ve caused WWIII if Biden sent nukes to Ukraine

The presidency has too much power if it can unilaterally make a non-emergency decision that’s tantamount to an act of war https://t.co/1i7KwFmiR8

— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) November 25, 2024

According to the Times, this move would provide an immediate and significant deterrent against Russian aggression.

However, such an action would be complicated and carry substantial geopolitical ramifications.

Andriy Zagorodnyuk, a former Ukrainian defense minister, emphasized the importance of reversing the momentum on the battlefield to create conditions for potential peace talks.

In an interview, he stated that Ukraine and its allies must make strategic moves to put pressure on Russia and set the stage for negotiations, which would be crucial for any successful ceasefire.

In the midst of these discussions, the article also pointed out the political tensions surrounding Trump’s relationship with Russia.

Despite numerous investigations into Trump’s ties to the Kremlin, no evidence has emerged to suggest that he acted as an agent of Russia.

Similarly, The New York Times reported last week that there was no evidence linking Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s incoming Director of National Intelligence, to Russian interests.

These reports contradict the widespread narrative promoted by some in the American political class who have painted Trump and Gabbard as pro-Russian figures.

The ongoing debate over how to handle the situation in Ukraine is a critical issue for the incoming Trump administration, which is expected to take a different approach to Russia and foreign policy compared to the current Biden-Harris administration.

As Trump prepares to take office, the future direction of U.S. policy on Ukraine, NATO, and Russia will be closely watched by both domestic and international observers.

With tensions continuing to rise in Ukraine and around the world, the actions taken by both the Biden-Harris administration in its final months and the incoming Trump administration will play a significant role in shaping the future of global security.

The question remains whether these strategic discussions, including the potential return of nuclear weapons to Ukraine, will influence the trajectory of the war or further complicate U.S.-Russia relations.