In a significant ruling on Thursday, the Georgia Court of Appeals disqualified Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from pursuing her case against President-elect Donald Trump, citing a “conflict of interest” that could compromise the fairness of trials for Trump and his co-defendants.

The decision marks a major blow to the high-profile case and raises questions about its future.

The court’s decision reverses a prior ruling by a Georgia judge, which allowed Willis to continue overseeing the case despite allegations of nepotism involving her office.

Celebrate Trump's Historic 2024 Victory with the Exclusive Trump 47th President Collection!

The controversy centered on Nathan Wade, a former prosecutor in Willis’s office and her reported romantic partner, who had been implicated in the allegations.

Wade resigned from his role after it was revealed he had received more than $700,000 over two years while working on the Trump case.

These details came to light through efforts by Ashleigh Merchant, an attorney representing one of Trump’s co-defendants.

“After carefully considering the trial court’s findings in its order, we conclude that it erred by failing to disqualify DA Willis and her office,” wrote Judge E. Trenton Brown in the majority opinion, as reported by The New Republic.

Brown added that the trial court’s attempt to remedy the situation by addressing the “appearance of impropriety” did not adequately resolve concerns about the integrity of the proceedings.

He described the case as an exceptional one where disqualification was necessary to maintain public confidence.

Despite the ruling, the Georgia Appeals Court did not dismiss the indictment against Trump, leaving the case in limbo.

Legal experts suggest that state officials or lawmakers could appoint a special counsel to continue the case, though such a move would require significant coordination.

With Republicans controlling the state government, observers speculate that the process could face delays.

The disqualification of Willis has left the Trump case without a lead prosecutor, significantly complicating efforts to bring it to trial.

Willis was seen as the last major legal hurdle for Trump following his re-election to the White House.

Federal prosecutor Jack Smith, who had been handling two cases against Trump at the Department of Justice, has reportedly indicated plans to resign before Inauguration Day.

Additionally, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who secured a conviction against Trump in a separate case, has faced repeated delays in sentencing.

The disqualification ruling highlights the challenges in navigating high-profile legal cases involving political figures.

While the appeals court emphasized the importance of ensuring the integrity of judicial proceedings, the decision has effectively stalled one of the most prominent cases against the president-elect.

As the case now awaits potential reassignment, it remains uncertain whether it will ever reach trial. Observers will closely watch how state officials address the situation and whether any further developments could revive the stalled proceedings.

For now, the ruling underscores the complexities and controversies surrounding legal battles involving a sitting president-elect.